Federal Laws

American Indian Probate Reform Act of 2004

An Act To amend the Indian Land Consolidation Act to improve provisions relating to probate of trust and restricted land, and for other purposes.

An Act To amend the Indian Land Consolidation Act to improve provisions relating to probate of trust and restricted land, and for other purposes.

The Marshall Trilogy is a set of three cases decided by the United States Supreme Court that define the respective relationships among the federal government, states, and Indian tribes. These court decisions by Justice John Marshall are still relied upon and cited by federal Indian law ad tribal law practitioners today.

Key Cases

  1. Johnson v. M’Intosh Indian land rights, 1823

  2. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia Trust relationship, 1831

  3. Worcester v. Georgia Inherent Indian / tribal sovereignty, self-determination, laws of Georgia have no force in Cherokee lands, 1832

Marshall Trilogy

courthouse where tribal law cases and indigenous rights are adjudicated

Indian Law Bulletins  |  U.S. Regulatory Information

Indian Law Bulletins are a current awareness service of the National Indian Law Library. The purpose of the Indian Law Bulletins is to provide succinct and timely information about new developments in Indian Law.

Recent Developments